May 13, 2024: Congruent numbers, elliptic curves, the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer rank conjecture, and applications (for a general audience)
Congruent numbers. We say that a number is a congruent number if there are such that and , i.e., if the distance of successive numbers is . (One can prove that is congruent if and only if there is a right triangle with rational side lengths and area .)
Geometrically, we get an intersection of two surfaces of degree , and one can prove that the intersection is a plane cubic, e.g., the elliptic curve from the blog entry from December 24, 2023.
The equation of the cubic can be computed using a computer algebra system like Magma.
Elliptic curves. What have we gained? We are in a situation where we have a lot of theoretical results and algorithms. Solutions to plane cubics carry the structure of an abelian group , i.e., one can add points to get new ones. Furthermore, the theorem of Mordell (1922) says that the Mordell–Weil group is finitely generated, i.e., that any solution can be obtained by adding finitely many points. Only because of this result, we can represent in a computer!
Finite generation means that for some (algebraic) rank . It turns out that the finite torsion subgroup is easily computed (there are only finitely many possibilities, see e.g. the blog entry from May 14, 2023), but it is a big unsolved open problem to compute . If one knows , one can compute a generating set of .
The BSD rank conjecture. Conjecturally, one can compute using the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture: Note that the analytic rank is an analytic and local invariant (more about this in a later blog entry), while the rank is algebraic and global in nature.
In algebra, one often has an equality (number we want to compute) (number we can compute). It is more difficult here: We cannot compute both numbers individually, but assuming we know they are equal, we can compute both of them at the same time.
Applications. For example, this conjecture says that is finite iff iff , and this is something computable (Cremona, Dokchitser). For example, the elliptic curve above has , which proves that it is non-zero (note that a computation can show that an approximate complex number is non-zero, but proving equality to is much harder!), hence is finite. One can easily prove that , and this implies that is not a congruent number!
Another application is Fermat’s Last Theorem for the exponent . One can compute that the equation is equivalent to the elliptic curve and that . One has , and this shows that the original equation only has trivial solutions over .